The need to engage in a spirited exchange seems to be
an imperative with some who would plead Rome's case, but are they
searching for truth or defending a lie?
Since Vatican II, the Roman church has been on the
ecumenical bandwagon. As the new millennium approaches, Rome's interest in
gathering all professing Christians to her bosom seems to be intensifying.
Is this a realistic goal? Will Christians have to turn aside from
foundational doctrines of the faith in order to embrace Roman theology? Is
the Roman church willing to honestly look at her dogma and doctrine and,
where necessary, bring them into line with the clear teaching of
Scripture?
Any sweetheart ecumenical arrangement between
Christians and the Roman church will be hopelessly one-sided. The Roman
Catholic church has no intention of modifying her dogma, doctrine or
practice one iota, so the Chrstian interested in joining the Roman circus
will be expected to abandon all his beliefs which are not in line with
what the RCC holds as truth. Ecumenism? No way! We are talking about
subjugation to an earthly cult.
"Furthermore, in ecumenical dialogue, Catholic
theologians, STANDING FAST BY THE TEACHING OF THE CHURCH yet searching
together with severed brethren into the divine mysteries, should do so
with love for the truth, with charity, and with humility. When comparing
doctrines with one another, they should remember that in Catholic
doctrine there exists an order or "hierarchy" of truths, since they vary
in their relation to the foundation of the Christian faith. Thus the way
will be opened whereby this kind of "fraternal rivalry" will incite all
to a deeper realization and a clearer expression of the unfathomable
riches of Christ.[3]--Vatican II, Decree on Ecumenism, (UNITATIS
REDINTEGRATIO), para 11c, 21 November 1964) [Emphasis not in
original]
"Standing fast by the teachings of the Church…"
certainly shows Rome's willingness to engage in honest dialogue. Sure,
they'll talk about their doctrine, but only to argue that it is correct,
not to look honestly at it in light of what the Bible says. It has been my
experience and observation that, more likely than not, the RCC spokesman
will go to just about any length, including the use of misquotes, shifting
sources, denial of the clear wording of even RCC documents, etc., in order
to defend Catholic dogma and doctrine.
Given Rome's doctrinal rigidity, the likelihood of
anything resembling meaningful dialogue on issues of biblical doctrine
seems quite remote. This is understandable, of course, when one considers
that any Roman Catholic who does not hold to the party line on matters of
dogma and doctrine will find himself anathematized. I should imagine that,
for those who have placed their hopes for eternity in the hands of Rome,
this is a fate almost too terrible to be contemplated. So, they promote
the façade of ecumenical dialogue when, in reality, they only parrot what
the Magisterium has declared to be 'truth.'
Is God in favor of ecumenism? Does He desire that His
creation unite without regard to doctrinal differences? Would He be
pleased to see believers forsaking sound biblical doctrine in order to
embrace the false teachings of Rome? The Bible is quite clear on this:
Be ye not unequally yoked together with
unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with
unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what
concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth
with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols?
for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell
in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my
people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith
the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And
will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith
the Lord Almighty.--2 Corinthians 6:14-18
Should believers give ear to the arguments of the Roman
apologists and proselyters? Should we give them opportunities to air their
heretical teachings in a Christian channel? Again, I do believe the Bible
gives clear guidance:
Galatians 1:6-9, "I marvel that ye are so soon
removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another
gospel: Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and
would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from
heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have
preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now
again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have
received, let him be accursed."
Salvation is in the Christ of Scripture, not the pale
clone of Rome.