I. Total Inability
By total inability Calvin meant that a lost
sinner cannot come to Jesus Christ and trust Him as Saviour, unless he is
foreordained to come to Christ. By total inability he meant that no man has
the ability to come to Christ. And unless God overpowers him and gives him
that ability, he will never come to Christ
The Bible teaches total depravity, and I believe
in total depravity. But that simply means that there is nothing good in man to
earn or deserve salvation. The Bible says in Jeremiah 17:9, "The heart is
deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked."
A preacher brought a wonderful sermon on the
depravity of the human heart. And when he finished his message, someone came
to him and said," I want you to know I can't swallow that depraved heart that
you preached about."
The preacher smiled and said, "You don't have to
swallow it. It's already in you!"
While the Bible teaches the depravity of the
human race, it nowhere teaches total inability. The Bible never hints that
people are lost because they have no ability to come to Christ. The language
of Jesus was, "Ye will not come to me, that ye might have life" (John 5:40).
Notice, it is not a matter of whether or not you
can come to Christ; it is a matter of whether or not you will come to Christ.
Jesus looked over Jerusalem and wept and said, "O
Jerusalem, Jerusalem . . .how often would I have gathered thy children
together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would
not!" (Matt. 23:37). Here again notice, He did not say, "How often would I
have gathered you together, but you could not." No. He said, "Ye would not!"
It was not a matter of whether they could; it was a matter of whether they
would.
Revelation 22:17, the last invitation in the
Bible, says, "And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth
say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take
the water of life freely ."
If it is true that no person has the ability to
come to Christ, then why would Jesus say in John 5:40, "Ye will not come to
me." why didn't He simply say, "You cannot come to me."?
The only thing that stands between the sinner and
salvation is the sinner's will. God made every man a free moral agent. And God
never burglarises the human will.
D. L. Moody addressed a large group of sceptics.
He said ,"I want to talk about the word believe, the word receive, and the
word take." When Mr. Moody had finished his sermon, he asked, "Now who will
come and take Christ as Saviour?"
One man stood and said, "I can't."
Mr. Moody wept and said, "Don't say, 'I can't.'
Say, 'I won't!'"
And the man said, "Then, I won't!"
But another man said, "I will!" Then another
said, "I will!" And another said , "I will!" Until scores came to trust Christ
as Saviour.
Some Calvinists use John 6:44 in an effort to
prove total inability. Here the Bible says, "No man can come to me except the
Father which hath sent me draw him...."But the Bible makes it plain in John
12:32 that Christ will draw all men unto Himself. Here the Bible says, "And I,
if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me."
All men are drawn to Christ, but not all men will
trust Christ as Saviour. Every man will make his own decision to trust Christ
or to reject Him. The Bible makes it clear that all men have light. John 1:9
says, "That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the
world." Romans 1:19,20 indicates that every sinner has been called through the
creation about him. And Romans 2:11-16 indicates that sinners are called
through their conscience, even when they have not heard the Word of God.
So in the final analysis, men go to Hell, not
because of their inability to come to Christ, but because they will not come
to Christ-"Ye will not come to me, that ye might have life."
The teaching that men, women and children are
totally unable to come to Christ and trust Him as Saviour is not a scriptural
doctrine. The language itself is not scriptural.
II. Unconditional Election
By unconditional election Calvin meant that some
are elected to Heaven, while others are elected to Hell, and that this
election is unconditional. It is wholly on God's part and without condition.
By unconditional election Calvin meant that God has already decided who will
be saved and who will be lost, and the individual has absolutely nothing to do
with it. He can only hope that God has elected him for Heaven and not for
Hell.
This teaching so obviously disagrees with the
oft-repeated invitations in the Bible to sinners to come to Christ and be
saved that some readers will think that I have overstated the doctrine. So I
will quote John Calvin in his "Institutes," Book III, chapter 23,
"....Not all men are created with similar destiny
but eternal life is foreordained for some , and eternal damnation for others.
Every man, therefore, being created for one or the other of these ends, we
say, he is predestined either to life or to death."
So Calvinism teaches that it is God's own choice
that some people are to be damned forever. He never intended to save them. He
foreordained them to go to Hell. And when He offers salvation in the Bible, He
does not offer it to those who were foreordained to be damned. It is offered
only to those who were foreordained to be saved.
This teaching insists that we need not try to win
men to Christ because men cannot be saved unless God has planned for them to
be saved. And if God has planned for them to be eternally lost, they will not
come to Christ.
There is the Bible doctrine of God's
foreknowledge, predestination and election. Most knowledgeable Christians
agree that God has His controlling hand on the affairs of men. They agree that
according to the Bible, He selects individuals like Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and
David as instruments to do certain things He has planned. Most Christians
agree that God may choose a nation-particularly that He did choose Israel,
through which He gave the law, the prophets, and eventually through whom the
Saviour Himself would come- and that there is a Bible doctrine that God
foreknows all things.
I have often said, “Did it ever occur to you that
nothing ever occurred to God?” God in His foreknowledge knows who will trust
Jesus Christ as Saviour, and He has predestined to see that they are justified
and glorified. He will keep all those who trust Him and see that they are
glorified. But the doctrine that God elected some men to Hell, that they were
born to be damned by God's own choice, is a radical heresy not taught anywhere
in the Bible.
I have in my hand a booklet entitled TULIP
written by Vic Lockman. In the booklet Mr. Lockman attempts to prove the five
points of Calvinism. Under the point, Unconditional Election, he quotes
Ephesians 1:4, but he only quotes the first part of the verse: "He hath chosen
us in him before the foundation of the world. " However, that is not the end
of the verse. Mr. Lockman, like most Calvinists, stopped in the middle of the
verse. The entire verse reads: "According as he hath chosen us in him before
the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before
him in love." The verse says nothing about being chosen for Heaven or Hell. It
says we are chosen that we should be holy and without blame before him in love
Under the same point, Unconditional Election, Mr.
Lockman quotes John 15:16, "Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you."
Again, Mr. Lockman, like most Calvinists, stops in the middle of the verse.
The entire verse reads: "Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and
ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit
should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may
give it you."
The verse says nothing about being chosen for
Heaven or Hell. It says we are chosen to go and bring forth fruit, which
simply means that every Christian is chosen to be a soul winner. The fruit of
a Christian is other Christians. Proverbs 11:30 says, "The fruit of the
righteous is a tree of life; and he that winneth souls is wise."
Nowhere does the Bible teach that God wills for
some to go to Heaven and wills others to go to Hell. No. The Bible teaches
that God would have all men to be saved. Second Peter 3:9 says that He is "not
willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." First
Timothy 2:4 says, "Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the
knowledge of the truth."
Those who teach that God would only have some to
be saved, while He would have others to be lost are misrepresenting God and
the Bible.
Does God really predestinate some people to be
saved and predestinate others to go to Hell, so that they have no free choice?
Absolutely not! Nobody is predestined to be saved, except as he chooses of his
own free will to come to Christ and trust Him for salvation. And no one is
predestined to go to Hell, except as he chooses of his own free will to reject
Christ and refuses to trust Him as Saviour. John 3:36 says, "He that believeth
on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not
see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him."
Nothing could be plainer. The man who goes to
Heaven goes because he comes to Jesus Christ and trusts Him as Saviour. And
the man who goes to Hell does so because he refuses to come to Jesus Christ
and will not trust Him as Saviour.
III. Limited Atonement
By limited atonement, Calvin meant that Christ
died only for the elect, for those He planned and ordained to go to Heaven: He
did not die for those He planned and ordained to go to Hell. Again I say, such
language is not in the Bible , and the doctrine wholly contradicts many, many
plain Scriptures.
For instance, the Bible says in I John 2:2, "He
is the propitiation for our sins: and not for our's only, but also for the
sins of the whole world ." The teaching of Calvinism on Limited Atonement
contradicts the express statement of Scripture. First Timothy 2:5,6 says, "
The man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all...."
The Bible teaches that Jesus is the Saviour of
the world. John 4:42 says, "And said unto the woman, Now we believe , not
because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is
indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world." Again I John 4:14, "And we have
seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the
world." The Scriptures make it plain that Jesus came to save the world. John
3:17 says, " For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but
that the world through him might be saved."
No man will ever look at Jesus Christ and say,
"You didn't want to be my Saviour ." No! No! Jesus wants to be the Saviour of
all men. As a matter of fact, I Timothy 4:10 says, "For therefore we both
labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the
Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe."
The Bible teaches that Christ bore the sins of
all people. Isaiah 53:6 says, "All we like sheep have gone astray; we have
turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of
us all." There are twos "alls" in this verse. The first "all" speaks of the
universal fact of sin- "All we like sheep have gone astray." And the second
"all" speaks of universal atonement-"and the Lord hath laid on him the
iniquity of us all." The "all" in the first part of Isaiah 53:6 covers. If all
went astray, then the iniquities of all were laid on Christ.
Not only did He bear the sins of us all, but the
Bible plainly teaches that He died for the whole world.Look at John 2:2: "And
he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but for the sins
of the whole world." If that isn't plain enough, the Bible says His death was
for every man; "But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels
for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the
grace of God should taste death for every man" (Heb. 2:9).
Nothing could be plainer than the fact that Jesus
Christ died for every man. First timothy 2:5,6 says, "For there is one God,
and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a
ransom for all. . . . " Romans 8:32 states, "He that spared not his own Son,
but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us
all things?"
Look at the statements--statement after
statement: "that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man";
"Who gave himself a ransom for all"; "delivered him up for us all."
John 3:16 has often been called "the heart of the
Bible." It has been called "the Bible in miniature." "For God so loved the
world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him
should not perish, but have everlasting life." Jesus died for the whole world.
He suffered Hell for every man who has ever lived or ever will live. And no
man will look out of Hell and say, "I wanted to be saved, but Jesus did not
die for me."
Some argue that if Jesus died for the whole
world, the whole world would be saved. No. the death of Jesus Christ on the
cross was sufficient for all, but it is efficient only to those who believe.
The death of Jesus Christ on the cross made it possible for every man
everywhere to be saved. But only those who believe that He died to pay their
sin debt and who trust Him completely for salvation will be saved.
Again I quote John 3:36, "He that believeth on
the Son hath everlasting life. . . ." Everybody is potentially saved, but
everybody is not actually saved until he recognises that he is a sinner,
believes that Jesus Christ died on the cross to pay the sin debt, and trust
Him completely for salvation.
The atonement is not limited. it is as universal
as sin. Romans 5:20 says, "But where sin abounded, grace did much more
abound." Isaiah 53:6 states, "All we like sheep have gone astray; we have
turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of
us all."
A famous English preacher spoke in an English
town, then rushed to catch his train for London. A sinner who heard him preach
felt that he must immediately settle the matter of salvation. So he followed
the preacher to the train. Just as the train pulled into the station, he took
hold of the preacher's lapel and said, " I want to be saved! Tell me how!"
The minister said, "I must catch this last rain
to London. Do you have a Bible?"
"Yes, I have one at home," said the anxious
inquirer.
"Then go home and find Isaiah 53:6. Read it
carefully. Go in at the first all, and come out at the last all, and you will
be saved."
The preacher rushed away, and the anxious sinner
was left alone. He went back to his home, and opening his Bible, he turned to
Isaiah 53:6. What did the preacher mean, he wondered--"Go in at the first all
and come out at the last all, and you will be saved"? He found the verse and
read it carefully: "All we like sheep have gone astray."
Well, he thought to himself, I can certainly go
in at the first all. I have gone astray. I am a poor, lost sinner. The he read
the last part of the verse, "And the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us
all." He said to himself, "If I come out at the last all, I must believe that
all my sins were laid on Christ, that He took my place and paid for my sins.
And if I rely upon that, I will be saved. That's what the preacher meant."
He then trusted Christ and was saved. He believed
that he was a sinner, and that all his sins had been laid on Christ.
IV. Irresistible Grace
The fourth point of Calvinism is irresistible
grace. By irresistible grace, John Calvin meant that God simply forces people
to be saved. God elected some to be saved, and he let Jesus Christ die for
that elect group. And now by irresistible grace, He forces those He elected,
and those Jesus Christ died for to be saved.
The truth of the matter is, there is no such
thing as irresistible grace. Nowhere in the Bible does the word "irresistible"
appear before the word "grace". That terminology is simply not in the Bible.
It is the philosophy of John Calvin, not a Bible doctrine. The word
"irresistible" doesn't even sound right in front of the word "grace."
Grace means "God's unmerited favour." Somebody
said G-R-A-C-E- God's riches at Christ's expense. Grace is an attitude, not a
power. If Calvin had talked about the irresistible drawing power of God, it
would have made more sense. But instead, he represents grace as the
irresistible act of God compelling a man to be saved who does not want to be
saved, so that a man has no choice in the matter at all, except as God
forcibly puts a choice in his mind. Calvinism teaches that man has no part in
salvation, and cannot possibly co-operate with God in the matter. In no sense
of the word and at no stage of the work does salvation depend upon the will or
work of man or wait for the determination of his will.
Does the Bible say anything about irresistible
grace? Absolutely not! The Scriptures show that men do resist and reject God.
Proverbs 29:1 states, "He, that being often reproved hardeneth his neck, shall
suddenly be destroyed, and that without remedy." Notice the word "often" in
this verse. If God only gave one opportunity to be saved, then man could not
complain. But here the Bible says, "He, that being often reproved.. . " This
means the man was reproved over and over again. Not only was he reproved many
times, but he was reproved often. But the Bible says he "hardeneth his neck"
and "shall suddenly be destroyed, and that without remedy." That certainly
doesn't sound like irresistible grace. The Bible teaches that a man can be
reproved over and over again, and that he can harden his neck against God, and
as a result will be destroyed without remedy.
Again Proverbs 1:24-26 says,
"Because I have called, and ye refused; I have stretched out my hand, and no
man regarded; But ye have set at nought all my counsel, and would none of my
reproof: I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear
cometh."
Here the Bible plainly says, "I have called, and
ye have refused; I have stretched out my hand, and no man regarded; But ye
have set at nought all my counsel, and would none of my reproof." That doesn't
sound like irresistible grace. God calls, and men refuse. Is that
irresistible? God stretches out his hand and no man regards it? Is that
irresistible grace? No. The Bible makes it plain that some men do reject
Christ, that they refuse His call. John 5:40 says, "Ye will not come to me,
that ye may have life." That verse plainly teaches that men can and do resist
God and refuse to come to Him.
In Acts chapter 7, we find Stephen preaching. He
says in verse 51, "Ye stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do
always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye." To these Jewish
leaders, Stephen said, "Ye do always resist the Holy Ghost."
So here were people; some of whom had seen Jesus
and heard Him preach; others who had heard Peter at Pentecost; others who had
heard Stephen and other Spirit-filled men preaching with great power. And what
had they done? They were stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears.
That is ,they were stubborn and rebellious against God. The Bible plainly
says, "They resisted the Holy Ghost."
Notice the words of Stephen in verse 51, "Ye do
always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye." Here the Bible
teaches that not only were these Jewish leaders resisting the Holy Ghost, but
that their fathers before them had also resisted the Holy Spirit. Stephen says
that all the way from Abraham, through the history of the Jewish nation, down
to the time of Christ, unconverted Jews had resisted the Holy Spirit.
There is absolutely no such thing as a
"can't-help-it-religion." God doesn't just force men to be saved with His
so-called irresistible grace.
God offers salvation to all men. Titus 1:11 says,
"For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men." But
man must make his own choice. He must either receive or reject Christ . John
1:12 says. "But as many as received him , to them gave he power to become the
sons of God, even to them that believe on his name."
When Jesus wept over Jerusalem, he said, "O
Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which
are sent unto thee, ho often would I have gathered thy children together, even
as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!" Here again
the Bible clearly indicates that God would have gathered them together as a
hen gathers her chickens, but they would not. That certainly shows that they
could reject and resist Christ.
"I would, but ye would not" does not fit the
teaching of irresistible grace. So people do resist the Holy Ghost. They do
refuse to come to Christ. They do harden their necks. They do refuse when God
calls.
That means that those who are not saved could
have been saved. Those who have rejected Christ could have accepted Him. God
offers salvation to those who will have it, but does not enforce it upon
anyone who doesn't want it.
V. Perseverance of the Saints
The Bible teaches, and I believe in, the eternal
security of the born-again believer. The man who has trusted Jesus Christ has
everlasting life and will never perish. But the eternal security of the
believer does not depend on his perseverance.
I do not know a single Bible verse that says
anything about the saints' persevering, but there are several Bible verses
that mention the fact that the saints have been preserved. Perseverance is one
thing. Preservation is another. No. The saints do not persevere; they are
preserved.
The Bible states in Jude 1. "Jude, the servant of
Jesus Christ, and brother of James, to them that are sanctified by God the
Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ..." First Thessalonians 5:23 says, "And
the very God of peace sanctify you wholly: and I pray God your whole spirit
and soul, and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus
Christ."
The other morning I opened a jar of peach
preserves. I don't know how long those peaches have been in that jar. But the
jar had been sealed some time ago, and the peaches were preserved. When I took
out the preserves and ate them with a good hot biscuit, they were as good as
they were the day they were placed in the jar.
But wait a minute! The peaches had nothing to do
with it. They were not fresh and good because they had persevered. They were
good and fresh because they had been preserved.
The Bible makes it plain that the believer is
kept. He does not keep himself. First Peter 1:4,5 states:
"To an inheritance incorruptible, and
undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you, Who are
kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed
in the last time."
The Bible says in John 10:27-29:
"My sheep hear my voice, and I know them and
they follow me: And I give unto them eternal life: and they shall never
perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which
gave them me, is greater than all, and no man is able to pluck them out of
my Fathers hand."
Now that doesn't sound like perseverance of the
sheep or the saints. Here the sheep are in the Fathers hand, and they are
safe-not because they persevere, but because they are in the Fathers hand.
Charles Spurgeon once said, "I do not believe in
the perseverance of the Saviour."
To be sure, the Bible teaches the eternal
security of the believer. But the believer's security has nothing to do with
his persevering. We are secure because we are kept by God. We are held in the
Father's hand. And according to Ephesians 4:30, we have been sealed by the
Holy Spirit until the day of redemption.
So I disagree with all five points of Calvinism
as John Calvin taught it.
There is a belief that if one does not teach
universal salvation, he must either be a Calvinist or an Arminian. In this
book, The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination, Dr. Loraine Boettner
says on page 47,
“There are really only three systems which
claim to set forth the way of salvation through Christ [And he names them]:”
(1) Universalism, that all will be saved. (2) Arminianism, which holds that
Christ died equally and indiscriminately for every individual......., that
saying grace is not necessarily permanent, but that those who are loved of
God, ransomed by God, and born of the Holy Spirit may (let God wish and
strive ever so much to the contrary) throw away all and perish eternally;
and (3) Calvinism.”
He continues, “Only two are held by Christians.” That is Calvin's position
and Arminius' position.”
Calvinists would like to make people believe that
if one does not teach universal salvation, he must either be a Calvinist or an
Arminian. And since the Arminian position does such violence to the grace of
God, many preferred to call themselves Calvinists. But a person doesn't have
to take either position.
I am neither Arminian nor Calvinist. I believe in
salvation by grace through faith in the finished work of Christ. I believe in
the eternal security of the believer. I believe that Jesus Christ died for all
men, and I believe what the Bible says, "That whosoever shall call upon the
name of the Lord shall be saved."
But I disagree with all five points of Calvinism
as John Calvin taught it.
In conclusion, let me say that Calvin and those
who followed him claimed to believe and follow the Bible. They claimed to find
at least a germ of the Calvinist doctrine in the Scriptures. But a careful
student will find that again and again they go beyond Scripture, and that
Calvinism is a philosophy developed by man and depending on fallible logic and
frail, human reasoning, with the perversion of some Scriptures, the misuse of
others, and the total ignoring of many clear Scriptures. Calvin did teach many
wonderful, true doctrines of the Scripture.
It is true that God foreknows everything that
will happen in the world. It is true that God definitely ordained and
determined some events ahead of time and selected some individuals for His
purposes. It is certain that people are saved by grace, and are kept by the
power of God. That far Calvinists may well their doctrines by the Scriptures.
But beyond that, Calvinism goes into the realm of human philosophy.
It is not a Bible doctrine, but a system of human
philosophy, especially appealing to the scholarly intellect, the
self-sufficient and proud mind. Brilliant, philosophical, scholarly preachers
are apt to be misled on this matter more than the humble-hearted,
Bible-believing Christian.
OBJECTIONS ANSWERED
Dear Rev__________:
I have your letter which came recently, objecting
to my article, "Why I Disagree With All Five Points of Calvinism." In the
second paragraph of page 1, you say, "As to will. . . "Then you spend the next
two or three pages talking about will and calling attention to Bible verses.
You mention Titus 3:5 where the Bible says, " Not by works of righteousness
which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of
regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost."
I have just read this section of your letter over
several times, and you seem to confuse works with will. For instance, you call
attention to Isaiah 64:6 where the Bible says, " all our righteousnesses are
as filthy rags. " Trusting Christ for salvation is the opposite of works. When
a man believes that Jesus Christ died for him and fully trusts Jesus to save
him, and nothing else, then he's not working for salvation. He's trusting
Christ and what Christ did at Calvary.
But it is his own will that he trusts Christ. God
doesn't make anyone trust Him. In John 5:40 Jesus said, "Ye will not come to
me, that ye might have life." He did not say you cannot come; He said you will
not come.
You go on to say in this particular part of your
letter, "We are sinners from birth. . . as Adam, we hid ourselves from God."
It is true that Adam hid himself from God. But
when God came and called for Adam, Adam answered God of his own will and he
came out from his place of hiding of his own will. God did not take Adam by
the hand and drag him out of the place of hiding. He simply called and Adam
came out. Every man comes to God of his own will.
In Matthew 23:37 Jesus said, “O Jerusalem,
Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent
unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a
hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!”
Still discussing the matter of will, you make
reference to Romans 5:12 and say that we are dead in sin. Then you continue,
“Note a dead person cannot move, respond, walk, nor anything.”
Now, you have a misunderstanding of death. Death
is not annihilation. Death is not cessation of existence. Death is simply
separation. Physical death is the separation of the soul and spirit from the
body, and spiritual death is the separation of the man from God.
In the parable of the prodigal son, when the
prodigal returned home the father said, "This my son was dead, and is alive
again." The prodigal son was dead in the sense that he was separated from the
father. He was certainly capable of making decisions while he was in the far
country separated from the father. As a matter of fact, he made the decision
and went back to the father. Luke 15:18-20 says, “I will arise and go to my
father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and
before thee. And am no more worthy to be called thy son: make me as one of thy
hired servants. And he arose, and came to his father.”
Now, here is a dead person who could move,
respond, walk, see his need, decide to do something about it, and go to the
father. And verse 24 says, "For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he
was lost, and is found."
Your misunderstanding of death has led you to
build a false doctrine based on an illustration, instead of Scripture. In
Genesis 2:17 God said to Adam, “..for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou
shalt surely die.” If you'll read the next few chapters of Genesis, you will
find that Adam did not die in the sense of ceasing to exist when he partook of
the forbidden fruit. As a matter of fact, Genesis 5:4 says, “And the days of
Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons
and daughters.” According to this verse, Adam lived eight hundred years after
he begat Seth, and Seth was not begotten until after Adam disobeyed God.
Now, was God wrong when He said to Adam, “Thou
shalt surely die”? No. Well, did Adam die? Yes, He died in the sense that God
drove him from His presence, and he was separated from God because of his
sins.
When the Bible says that men are dead in
trespasses and sins, that does not mean they cannot move, respond, walk, nor
anything as you said in your letter. Adam did a lot of moving and a lot of
responding and a lot of walking in the more than 800 years he lived after the
fall.
So you see, when the Bible says that “death
passed upon all men, for that all have sinned,” that “death” is not to be
compared with the body of a dead man lying in a casket. I might say that what
you see in the casket in the funeral home is really not the man. The body that
you're looking at is only the house in which the man lived. The man who lived
in that house is still alive. He's either with Christ in Heaven, or he's in
Hell, depending on whether or not he trusted Christ as his Saviour. If he's in
Heaven, he can certainly move, respond , and walk. And if he's in Hell, he can
certainly move, respond, and walk.
I won't take the space to quote the many Bible
verses concerning the dead, but I suggest you read the story of the rich man
in Luke 16 and you will see that though he had died he could still talk and
make decisions. And if you'll read Revelation 6:9-11 and Luke 15: 7 and 10,
you will see that people who are in Heaven are conscious. You will see that
they rejoice. They talk. They know what's happening on earth, and they ask
questions of the Lord. So you're wrong when you compare the spiritually dead
state of a sinner with that of a body lying in a casket.
Further in your letter, you tell of a young girl
who was supposedly led wrong by what you call Baptist doctrine. You say she
accepted Christ, and now she is living immorally and impure.
Now, Mr.___________, I can only say what the
Bible says in Hebrews 12:8, “But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all
are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.” If the young girl you
mentioned has trusted Christ as Saviour, I can assure you that she has
everlasting life and she will be chastened. John 3:36 says, “He that believeth
on the Son hath everlasting life.” Now that's a fact. It's not a
matter of what I think about it. It's a matter of what the Bible says. And
Hebrews 12:8 makes it clear that those who trusted Christ as Saviour will be
chastised.
On page 5 you say, “Now as to perseverance...”
and you call attention to Revelation 3:5 and talk about overcoming. You imply
that this overcoming is some kind of perseverance or effort.
First John 5:4,5 says, “For whosoever is born of
God overcometh the world: and this is the victory that overcometh the world,
even our faith. Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth
that Jesus is the Son of God?” Here the Bible says plainly that the victory
that overcometh the world is our faith. We overcome the world by trusting
Christ, not by persevering.
I made it plain in my article that I believe in
eternal security, but the saints are not secure because they persevere. They
are secure because they have been preserved. The word “perseverance” is
defined in Webster's Dictionary as “a persistent effort.” “Preservation” is
defined as “the act of keeping or state of being kept from injury or decay.”
The victory that overcomes the world is not your
perseverance. It is your faith, according to 1 John 5:4.
You close your letter with a P.S., “Note no human
is born of his own will but of the will of the parents. Christ says we are to
be born again.”
Again, you make the mistake of using a human
illustration in order to build a Bible doctrine. You seem to make the same
mistake that Nicodemus made in John chapter 3. He tried to compare the
spiritual birth to the physical birth. In John 3:4 he said to Christ, “How can
a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's
womb, and be born?”
You cannot compare the physical birth to the
spiritual birth. Jesus said in verse 6, “That which is born of the flesh is
flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.” They are two different
things. You will be better off if you will build Bible doctrine on what the
Bible says rather than on illustrations.
I hope this letter helps you to better understand
my position. I want you to re-read the sermon, “Why I Disagree With All Five
Points of Calvinism,” carefully.
I'm glad you receive THE SWORD OF THE LORD, and I
want you to feel free to express your opinions about anything you find written
in the paper.
Sincerely in Christ,
Curtis Hutson
Copyright 1980 by
Sword of the
Lord Publishers;
ISBN 0-87398-931-7
* * *
* * * *
“There is
power in this Gospel message. Most people just don't know how to present
it... The clarity of the Gospel is what makes it easy for them to
believe” —Pastor Yankee Arnold, a quote from the
excellent MP3 sermon titled, “WHY
GRACE CAN SAVE THE WORST MAN!”
The term “Calvinism” is loosely used by some people who do not hold Calvin's
teaching on predestination and do not understand exactly what Calvin taught.
